P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 19, Issue 2, 2012January 01, 2012 EDT
The Eye Alone is the Judge: Images and Design Patents
The Eye Alone is the Judge: Images and Design Patents
Rebecca Tushnet,
design patentsaesthetic elementnonfunctional elementsproduct designUSPTOGorham v. Whitesubstantial similarityidea/expression distinctioncopyright infringementdesign patent infringementApple v. Samsung
Articles in Vol. 19, Issue 2, 2012
Vol. 19, Issue 2, 2012
- The Evolution of Copyright Law and Inductive Speculations as to Its FutureOrit Fischman-Afori
- Functionality in Design Protection SystemsJason J. Du MontMark D. Janis
- Convergence After All? A Comparative View on the U.S. and EU Trademark System in the Light of the "Trade Mark Study"Annette Kur
- The End of the Work As We Know ItMichael J. Madison
- Dastar's Next StandMark P. McKenna
- Beauty Fades: An Experimental Study of Federal Court Design Patent AestheticsDr. Andrew W. Torrance
- The Eye Alone is the Judge: Images and Design PatentsRebecca Tushnet
- Passing the Virtual Buck: How the Ninth Circuit Used Contributory Trademark Law to Expand Liability for Web HostsAlessandra Backus
- Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: How a Drastic Remodeling of 17 U.S.C. § 108 Could Help Save AcademiaSavanna Nolan
- The Health Impact Fund Proposal: Application in the United States' Era of Comparative EffectivenessKatherine Jeanne Racz
- Crossing the Line: The Collegiate Licensing Company's Overindulgent Attempt to Limit Small Businesses' Online Marketing Techniques Based on Frivolous Claims of Trademark InfringementLauren T. Warbington
Rebecca Tushnet, The Eye Alone Is the Judge: Images and Design Patents, 19 Ga J.L. & Tech. 409 (2012).