P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 19, Issue 2, 2012January 01, 2012 EDT
Functionality in Design Protection Systems
Functionality in Design Protection Systems
Jason J. Du Mont, Mark D. Janis,
design patentutility patentornamentalitymatter of concern testfunctionalityEU Community DesignOddzOn Prods. Inc. v. Just Toys Inc.Egyptian Goddess Inc. v. Swisa Inc.L.A. Gear Inc. v. Thom McAn Shoe Co.Richardson v. Stanley Works Inc.trade dress functionality doctrine
Articles in Vol. 19, Issue 2, 2012
Vol. 19, Issue 2, 2012
- The Evolution of Copyright Law and Inductive Speculations as to Its FutureOrit Fischman-Afori
- Functionality in Design Protection SystemsJason J. Du MontMark D. Janis
- Convergence After All? A Comparative View on the U.S. and EU Trademark System in the Light of the "Trade Mark Study"Annette Kur
- The End of the Work As We Know ItMichael J. Madison
- Dastar's Next StandMark P. McKenna
- Beauty Fades: An Experimental Study of Federal Court Design Patent AestheticsDr. Andrew W. Torrance
- The Eye Alone is the Judge: Images and Design PatentsRebecca Tushnet
- Passing the Virtual Buck: How the Ninth Circuit Used Contributory Trademark Law to Expand Liability for Web HostsAlessandra Backus
- Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: How a Drastic Remodeling of 17 U.S.C. § 108 Could Help Save AcademiaSavanna Nolan
- The Health Impact Fund Proposal: Application in the United States' Era of Comparative EffectivenessKatherine Jeanne Racz
- Crossing the Line: The Collegiate Licensing Company's Overindulgent Attempt to Limit Small Businesses' Online Marketing Techniques Based on Frivolous Claims of Trademark InfringementLauren T. Warbington
Jason J. Du Mont & Mark D. Janis, Functionality in Design Protection Systems, 19 Ga J.L. & Tech. 261 (2012).