P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2004January 01, 2004 EDT
Sine Qua Non: Trademark Infringement, Likelihood of Confusion, and the Business of Collegiate Licensing
Sine Qua Non: Trademark Infringement, Likelihood of Confusion, and the Business of Collegiate Licensing
C. Knox Withers,
collegiate merchandiselicensingtrademarkinfringementcollegiate trademark protectionenforcementlikelihood of confusionLanham Act
Articles in Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2004
Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2004
- Patent Quality and the Dedication RuleScott R. BoalickJournal of Intellectual Property
- Losing the Forest Among the Trees in the Festo Saga-Rationalizing the Doctrine of Equivalents and Prosecution History Estoppel in View of the Historical Justifications for Patent ProtectionRyan Thomas Grace
- "What's Really in the Package of a Naming Rights Deal?" Service Mark Rights and the Naming Rights of Professional Sports StadiumsChristian Maximilian VoigtJournal of Intellectual Property
- "Every Artist is a Cannibal, Every Poet is a Thief": Why the Supreme Court was Right to Reverse the Ninth Circuit in Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Joshua K. SimkoJournal of Intellectual Property
- ETW Corp. v. Jireb Publishing, Inc.: Turning an Athlete's Publicity Over to the PublicMichael J. Breslin
- When a Promise is not a Promise: Georgia's Law on Non-compete Agreements, as Interpreted by the Eleventh Circuit in Keener v. Convergys Corporation, Gives Rise to Comity and Federalism ConcernsChristopher D. David
- Sine Qua Non: Trademark Infringement, Likelihood of Confusion, and the Business of Collegiate LicensingC. Knox Withers
C. Knox Withers, Sine Qua Non: Trademark Infringement, Likelihood of Confusion, and the Business of Collegiate Licensing, 11 Ga J.L. & Tech. 421 (2004).