P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2004January 01, 2004 EDT
Patent Quality and the Dedication Rule
Patent Quality and the Dedication Rule
Scott R. Boalick, Journal of Intellectual Property,
Patentpatent prosecutionpatent acquisitiondedication rulepatent qualitysubject matterclaimsUnited States Patent and Trademark Officedoctrine of equivalentsJohnson & Johnston AssociatesInc. v. RE. Service Co.
Articles in Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2004
Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2004
- Patent Quality and the Dedication RuleScott R. BoalickJournal of Intellectual Property
- Losing the Forest Among the Trees in the Festo Saga-Rationalizing the Doctrine of Equivalents and Prosecution History Estoppel in View of the Historical Justifications for Patent ProtectionRyan Thomas Grace
- "What's Really in the Package of a Naming Rights Deal?" Service Mark Rights and the Naming Rights of Professional Sports StadiumsChristian Maximilian VoigtJournal of Intellectual Property
- "Every Artist is a Cannibal, Every Poet is a Thief": Why the Supreme Court was Right to Reverse the Ninth Circuit in Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Joshua K. SimkoJournal of Intellectual Property
- ETW Corp. v. Jireb Publishing, Inc.: Turning an Athlete's Publicity Over to the PublicMichael J. Breslin
- When a Promise is not a Promise: Georgia's Law on Non-compete Agreements, as Interpreted by the Eleventh Circuit in Keener v. Convergys Corporation, Gives Rise to Comity and Federalism ConcernsChristopher D. David
- Sine Qua Non: Trademark Infringement, Likelihood of Confusion, and the Business of Collegiate LicensingC. Knox Withers
Scott R. Boalick & Journal of Intellectual Property, Patent Quality and the Dedication Rule, 11 Ga J.L. & Tech. 215 (2004).