P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2000January 01, 2000 EDT
Extrinsic Evidence in Patent Claim Interpretation: Understanding the Post-Markman Confusion
Extrinsic Evidence in Patent Claim Interpretation: Understanding the Post-Markman Confusion
Karl Koster,
extrinsic evidence in patent claim interpretationpatent infringement suitFederal Circuit's Vitronics Corp. v. ConceptronicInc.the Federal Circuit's 1995 Markman3 decisionavoiding confusionconstruction of a patentcourt's judicial tools for claim interpretationFederal Rule of Civil Procedurefinding of lawcourt's discretion in considering extrinsic evidence
Articles in Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2000
Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2000
- Network Effects in Technology Markets: Applying the Lessons of Intel and Microsoft to Future Clashes Between Antitrust and Intellectual PropertyJohn T. SomaKevin B. DavisUniversity of Denver College of LawUniversity of Denver College of Law
- Phantom Trademarks: Good Law or Chain Rattling? The Negative Effects of Strict Interpretation of the Lanham Act in the International Flavors and Fragrances DecisionJames E. Carlson
- A Satellite Dish or a Birdbath: The Efforts of the 106th Congress to Revise the Satellite Home Viewer ActChad Hunt
- Extrinsic Evidence in Patent Claim Interpretation: Understanding the Post-Markman ConfusionKarl Koster
- Patent Fairness Act of 1999: The Implications of Extending Patents for Pipeline DrugsShilpa Patel
Karl Koster, Extrinsic Evidence in Patent Claim Interpretation: Understanding the Post-Markman Confusion, 8 Ga J.L. & Tech. 113 (2000).