P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2000January 01, 2000 EDT
Phantom Trademarks: Good Law or Chain Rattling? The Negative Effects of Strict Interpretation of the Lanham Act in the International Flavors and Fragrances Decision
Phantom Trademarks: Good Law or Chain Rattling? The Negative Effects of Strict Interpretation of the Lanham Act in the International Flavors and Fragrances Decision
James E. Carlson,
In re International Flavors and FragranceLanham ActPhantom Trademarksfunctions of trademarksrequirements for registration of a trademarkTrademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP)Bongrain International Corp. v. Delice de FranceInc.likelihood of confusion
Articles in Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2000
Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2000
- Network Effects in Technology Markets: Applying the Lessons of Intel and Microsoft to Future Clashes Between Antitrust and Intellectual PropertyJohn T. SomaKevin B. DavisUniversity of Denver College of LawUniversity of Denver College of Law
- Phantom Trademarks: Good Law or Chain Rattling? The Negative Effects of Strict Interpretation of the Lanham Act in the International Flavors and Fragrances DecisionJames E. Carlson
- A Satellite Dish or a Birdbath: The Efforts of the 106th Congress to Revise the Satellite Home Viewer ActChad Hunt
- Extrinsic Evidence in Patent Claim Interpretation: Understanding the Post-Markman ConfusionKarl Koster
- Patent Fairness Act of 1999: The Implications of Extending Patents for Pipeline DrugsShilpa Patel
James E. Carlson, Phantom Trademarks: Good Law or Chain Rattling? The Negative Effects of Strict Interpretation of the Lanham Act in the International Flavors and Fragrances Decision, 8 Ga J.L. & Tech. 53 (2000).