P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 29, Issue 2, 2022January 01, 2022 EDT
Exposing the “Folklore” of Re-recording Clauses (Taylor’s Version)
Exposing the “Folklore” of Re-recording Clauses (Taylor’s Version)
Justin Tilghman, Journal of Intellectual Property,
Re-recording clauses restrictions on artist innovationTaylor Swift re-recording clauseRestrictions on re-recording musicSound recording restrictionsTaylor Swift fight for Master RecordingRe-recording clause void ab initioRe-recording sound recording
Articles in Vol. 29, Issue 2, 2022
Vol. 29, Issue 2, 2022
- Patent PerformativityDan L BurkJournal of Intellectual Property
- Reconsidering the Willful Blindness Doctrine in Contributory Trademark InfringementAndrew Ligon FantJournal of Intellectual Property
- When a “+” Doesn’t Add Anything in the Equation: Analyzing the Effect of the “+” on Trademark LawVasilios NasoulisJournal of Intellectual Property
- Greasing the Wheels of Patent Law: Clarifying the Judicial Exceptions via American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. v. Neapco Holdings LLCMichael OliverJournal of Intellectual Property
- Exposing the “Folklore” of Re-recording Clauses (Taylor’s Version)Justin TilghmanJournal of Intellectual Property
- Intellectual Heirs Property: Why Certain Musical Copyrights Should be Included in the Heirs Property Reform MovementAustin WeatherlyJournal of Intellectual Property
Justin Tilghman & Journal of Intellectual Property, Exposing the “Folklore” of Re-Recording Clauses (Taylor’s Version), 29 Ga J.L. & Tech. 402 (2022).