P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 24, Issue 1, 2016January 01, 2016 EDT
Backing Down: Blurred Lines in the Standards for Analysis of Substantial Similarity in Copyright Infringement for Musical Works
Backing Down: Blurred Lines in the Standards for Analysis of Substantial Similarity in Copyright Infringement for Musical Works
Nicholas Booth,
copyrightmusicinfringementWilliams v. Bridgeport MusicInc.Robin ThickeGot to Give It UpMarvin Gayesubstantial similarity testmusic theoryBlurred LinesInverse Ratio Rule
Articles in Vol. 24, Issue 1, 2016
Vol. 24, Issue 1, 2016
- Oracle v. Google and the Scope of a Computer Program CopyrightDennis S. KarjalaJournal of Intellectual Property
- DedicationJournal of Intellectual Property Law
- Discouraging Frivolous Copyright Infringement Claims: Fee Shifting under Rule 11 or 28 U.S.C. § 1927 as an Alternative to Awarding Attorney’s Fees under Section 505 of the Copyright ActDavid E. ShipleyJournal of Intellectual Property
- Combating the Anti-trade Movement: Evaluating the Trans-Pacific Partnership’s Place in International Patent LawWilliam G. Adams
- Backing Down: Blurred Lines in the Standards for Analysis of Substantial Similarity in Copyright Infringement for Musical WorksNicholas Booth
- Official Code, Locked Down: An Analysis of Copyright as it Applies to Annotations of State Official CodesShellea Diane Crochet
- A Tale of Two Composers: An Argument for a Limited Expansion of Moral Rights for ComposersCassidy Grunninger
- Insuring Failure: How Crowd-Sourcing Sites May be Forced Into the Role of Patent InsuranceSpencer S. Haley
- Powering Intellectual Property Sharing: How to Make Tesla’s Patent Pledge EffectiveBenjamin M. Hill
- Combatting Online Privacy: A Case Study on Popcorn Time and Revising Available Remedies to Copyright HoldersZachary Charles Fritts Landy
Nicholas Booth, Backing Down: Blurred Lines in the Standards for Analysis of Substantial Similarity in Copyright Infringement for Musical Works, 24 Ga J.L. & Tech. 99 (2016).