P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 22, Issue 2, 2015January 01, 2015 EDT
Clear and Convincing Disparagement: An Argument for a Higher Evidentiary Standard for When the T.T.A.B. Considers Cancelling a Well-Known, Tenured Trademark
Clear and Convincing Disparagement: An Argument for a Higher Evidentiary Standard for When the T.T.A.B. Considers Cancelling a Well-Known, Tenured Trademark
John C. Thomas III,
trademarkTrademark Trial and Appeal BoardTTABPTOWashington Redskinsprofessional sportsLanham Actdisparagementpreponderance of the evidenceclear and convincing evidence
Articles in Vol. 22, Issue 2, 2015
Vol. 22, Issue 2, 2015
- Copyright As ContractJeffrey L. HarrisonJournal of Intellectual Property
- Stop in the Name of the PTO! A Review of the Fresenius Saga and PTO-Judicial InterplayWayne A. Kalkwarf
- The Increasing Use of Challenges to Expert Evidence Under Daubert and Rule 702 in Patent LitigationDouglas G. Smith
- The Right to Say, "I Didn't Write That": Creating a Cause of Action to Combat False Attribution of Authorship on the InternetKathleen Brennan Hicks
- Slide to Unlock: Apple-Samsung, Alice, and the Need for Clarity in Assessing Patent-Eligibility Under Section 101 for Touchscreen Software PatentsTucker J. McKinley
- Clear and Convincing Disparagement: An Argument for a Higher Evidentiary Standard for When the T.T.A.B. Considers Cancelling a Well-Known, Tenured TrademarkJohn C. Thomas III
- Where There's a Will, There's a Way: Reconciling Theories of Willful Infringement and Disgorgement Damages in Trademark LawRachel Anne Zisek
John C. Thomas III, Clear and Convincing Disparagement: An Argument for a Higher Evidentiary Standard for When the T.T.A.B. Considers Cancelling a Well-Known, Tenured Trademark, 22 Ga J.L. & Tech. 435 (2015).