Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
Georgia Journal of Law & Technology
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Article
    • General
    • Note
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • search
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

https://gajolt.scholasticahq.com/feed
P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
General
Vol. 8, Issue 2, 2001January 01, 2001 EDT

Eldred v. Reno: An Example of the Law of Unintended Consequences

L. Ray Patterson, University of Georgia School of Law,
Eldred v. RenoCongress's copyright powerCopyright Term Extension Act (CTEA)publishers' interestsSony Corp. ofAmerican v. Universal City StudiosInc.West Publishing Co. v. Mead Data CentralCopyright Clause in Constitutionuse of the

Articles in Vol. 8, Issue 2, 2001

Vol. 8, Issue 2, 2001
  • Uncertainty and Unpredictability in Patent Litigation: The Time is Ripe for a Consistent Claim Construction Methodology
    Gretchen Ann BenderJournal of Intellectual Property
  • Eldred v. Reno: An Example of the Law of Unintended Consequences
    L. Ray PattersonUniversity of Georgia School of Law
  • A New Technology Question of Olympic Proportions: Should NBC's License to Broadcast the Games Include Internet Broadcasting Rights?
    Brandi Barnes Kellis
  • The Digital Millennium Copyright Act and the First Amendment: Can They Co-exist?
    Rachel Simpson Shockley
Georgia Journal of Law & Technology
L. Ray Patterson & University of Georgia School of Law, Eldred v. Reno: An Example of the Law of Unintended Consequences, 8 Ga J.L. & Tech. 223 (2001).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system