P-ISSN 2575-3819
E-ISSN 2575-3827
Vol. 3, Issue 2, 1996January 01, 1996 EDT
Replenishing the Ink of the Poison Pen: Restricting the Scope of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act in Garland Co. v. Ecology Roof Systems Corp.
Replenishing the Ink of the Poison Pen: Restricting the Scope of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act in Garland Co. v. Ecology Roof Systems Corp.
Ashley H. Draughon,
§ 43(a) of the Lanham Actcommercial advertising or promotionGarland Co. v. Ecology Roof Sys. Corp.false and misleading representations
Articles in Vol. 3, Issue 2, 1996
Vol. 3, Issue 2, 1996
- Copyright at a Turning Point: Corporate Responses to the Changing EnvironmentKenneth D. CrewsIndiana University School of Law-Indianapolis
- Unofficial Opinion of the Attorney General of the State of Georgia: The Scope of the Fair Use DoctrineGeorgia Department of Law State ofHobbs Michael E.Patterson L. Ray
- But How Far? Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.'s Expansion of the Scope of Patent DamagesRobert J. Cox
- Replenishing the Ink of the Poison Pen: Restricting the Scope of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act in Garland Co. v. Ecology Roof Systems Corp.Ashley H. Draughon
- 1995 Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property: Harmonizing the Commercial Use of Legal Monopolies With the Prohibitions of Antitrust LawThomas L. Hayslett III
- The Jury's Role in Patent Cases: Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.Paul N. Higbee Jr.
Ashley H. Draughon, Replenishing the Ink of the Poison Pen: Restricting the Scope of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act in Garland Co. v. Ecology Roof Systems Corp., 3 Ga J.L. & Tech. 353 (1996).